Canonical
on 29 September 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc870/cc8700a74a3f7ddf3fca08171f1a9058d61d67fb" alt=""
Naturally, a panic ensued while I tried to work out how to synchronise filesystems between OS X and the VirtualBox Ubuntu installation so I didn't have to drown in brown every time I looked at Ubuntu.
For Ubuntu 9.10 we asked people to submit images on Flickr, and selected 19 of these for inclusion on the CD. Here's what you get now:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e98be/e98be00f296922e2708e53b0e3519d01b9608c83" alt=""
Much nicer.
Here's the default appearance on 9.04 and then 9.10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe77e/fe77e42d8504ec77f060241337fa8dc09b8b938b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fba4c/fba4ca75cef55a3e09c8e03c9486ffac6787e00f" alt=""
It's not a quantum leap, but it feels like the lights have been turned on. The new default background is an organic version of the previous one - warmed up and subtly intriguing. The icons have been smartened up, the window title bar is darker yet somehow less intrusive, the 'panel' icons (top-right) are monochrome, and generally colour is being used more where it means something and less where it only adds visual noise.
I feel that we've managed to move things forward. There is a lot of work to do on a million other aspects of Ubuntu so I hope people won't get fixated on things like the default desktop too much - these are matters of taste and there are no correct answers - you have to trust that we have a long-term vision and that decisions are made to move things in a certain direction. We don't think you'll be disappointed when things really start to come through over the next few releases.